Back to all articles

With record low interest rates, whereto for investors?

| Market Forces

Just over a year ago, South Africa’s repo rate – the rate at which the Reserve Bank lends money to our commercial banks – stood at 6.75%. At a record pace it tumbled to its current 3.5%, after the Reserve Bank stepped in swiftly with ‘easier money’ to mitigate the economic carnage caused by worldwide lockdowns.

While interest rates at a near 50-year low is cause for celebration among those with home loans or other debt, they pose a serious problem for investors with a large portion of their portfolio in interest-bearing assets. These are notably retirees and investors who cannot afford to take on much market risk at this stage of their lives – whether that is due to temporary unemployment, the possibility of emigration or a large capital outlay looming in the short term.

South African repo rate – %

Source: tradingeconomics.com

Those with existing fixed deposits are not affected

Investors who locked in their interest rates in long-term fixed deposits should not be affected by 2020’s plunge in the repo rate. But those with money in short-term notice deposits, in bank savings accounts and money market funds will suddenly see their interest income being reduced. For those living off short-term investments, the reduction in interest income means greatly more pressure on an already tight monthly budget.

Why are cash rates down, but bonds and longer-term deposits offer great rates?

Investors who have been shopping around during lockdown for better interest rates, might have noticed an interesting phenomenon. Even though cash rates and the yields currently on offer from money market funds are not worth writing home about, yields on government and other bonds are currently very attractive. Yes, the yields from these two groups of investments have pulled in opposite directions. To understand this, investors need to understand that interest-bearing products operate in one of two markets: either the money market or the bond market.

The money market is where cash instruments are traded that mature (expire) within 12 months. The rates on money market instruments generally move in the same direction as the repo rate. There is little risk that inflation will shoot up within a few months and exceed the interest rate offered on these instruments. There is also not such a big risk that the banks issuing these instruments will not be able to repay the capital; information about a possible pending bank failure normally precedes the actual event by a few months. Because these risks are low, investors cannot expect much more than the prevailing repo rate from money market or cash-like instruments.

The bond market is generally for debt that matures (i.e. the capital amount needs to be paid back) after 12 months or longer. That would include government bonds and bonds issued by big corporates needing funding. Let’s explain by using an example that’s received a lot of attention lately: the RSA Retail Savings Bond. Despite the lower repo rate, this government bond offers a guaranteed fixed interest rate of 6% per year if investors commit their capital to the three-year fixed rate bond and 8% per year for the five-year fixed rate bond. That is more than double the current repo rate.

Why the big difference between the repo rate and five-year government bonds?

The reason for the big gap between the record-low repo rate and the rate on the five-year bond is mainly due to two reasons: the 1) inflation risk and 2) counterparty risk on longer-term bonds. Inflation has dropped to a low 3.2% currently, but with a weak rand and high levels of imports by SA, it could easily head in the opposite direction. Part of the gap is to compensate investors for the uncertainty of not knowing whether their investment will keep up with inflation over the next five year. As far as the second risk is concerned, although the SA government has never defaulted on debt before, counterparty risk significantly increased with the Moody’s downgrade to ‘junk’ earlier this year. With the growing pile of debt that government needs to repay to its various lenders, there is now an increased counterparty risk – also known as credit risk or default risk.

So, yes, the rates on longer-term bonds are attractive, but they need to be – to compensate investors for the higher risks associated with them compared to money market or cash instruments.

Where the ‘best’ rates are depends on your unique circumstances

One of the tested principles of financial planning is to allocate money in your portfolio to different types of assets depending on when you would most likely need that money. In the financial world it’s called asset-liability matching.

For money that you would need in case of emergency, it’s best to stick to funds that you can access with a few days’ notice and where you do not risk cashing in at a time when you could lose some of your capital. A notice deposit or a money market fund would suit this purpose and the best rate currently available on an SA notice deposit is 7% with 10 days’ notice once the money’s been in the account for more than 90 days. An earlier withdrawal is possible, but it would be at a reduced interest rate of only 4%. For money market funds, the current yields are currently around 5%.

For money that you would need within the next one to five years, you can afford to take on a little bit more risk with the potential to earn a higher return than with your emergency fund. We mentioned earlier the RSA Retail Savings Bond as an example of a higher-return product, but one with risks. Investing in a fixed-term fixed-rate deposit with an SA bank can give an even higher interest rate than that offered by the government, but that’s because it’s riskier. Remember, it’s normally central banks that bail out commercial banks when they’re in trouble, not the other way around. The weakness of both government bonds and bank deposits is that you are heavily exposed to one counterparty, either the government or the commercial bank. If you choose one of these, your interest-bearing portfolio lacks diversification. Plus, you are locked in for either two, three or five years. Your investment therefore also lacks accessibility – also known as liquidity.

For a commitment of one year or more, fixed income funds tick all the boxes

Investors with between one and three years left before they will need their capital may want to consider interest-bearing unit trusts too. Your money will typically be invested in a combination of the bond and money market and the value of your investment will vary from day to day along with the market value of the underlying assets. What they lack in terms of a guaranteed rate, interest-bearing unit trusts make up for by including variable rate instruments, such as inflation-linked bonds, giving investors a better chance of keeping up with inflation over the coming years, even if inflation spikes up.

But the greatest value that interest-bearing unit trust funds add is diversification – they spread the fund’s assets widely across various government and corporate bonds and bank instruments. And the returns are not looking too shabby either. Within the Sanlam Investment Management (SIM) stable, we offer the SIM Enhanced Yield Fund. The fund aims to offer a higher yield than a money market fund by taking advantage of the higher yields offered by a wide range of debt instruments including corporate bonds. Since its inception in 2011 its worst one-year performance has been 5.8% and in its best year it has given 9.7%.

The SIM Enhanced Yield Fund may not be able to beat your highest-rate fixed deposit over the next five years, but it offers a much safer, lower-risk solution to investors’ need for inflation-beating returns, irrespective of where inflation heads next. And, as with all unit trusts, it offers access to your capital within three days.

While it may be tempting to head straight for the investment or savings product offering the highest interest rates, the amount of risk that comes with that interest rate is an important consideration. The best investment is the one which meets investors’ goals – beating inflation and making sure all the capital is returned to them – with the highest degree of certainty.

 

 

Disclaimer: All information and opinions provided are of a general nature and are not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. We are not acting and do not purport to act in any way as an advisor or in a fiduciary capacity. No one should act upon such information or opinion without appropriate advice after a thorough examination of a particular situation. We endeavor to provide accurate and timely information but make no representation or warranty, express or implied, with respect to the correctness, accuracy or completeness of the information or opinions. Any representation or opinion is provided for information purposes only. Unit trusts are generally medium to long-term investments. Past performance of the investment in no guarantee of future returns. Unit trusts are traded at a ruling price and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. Sanlam Investments consists of the following authorised Financial Services Providers: Sanlam Investment Management (Pty) Ltd (“SIM”), Sanlam Multi Manager International (Pty) Ltd (“SMMI”), Satrix Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd, Graviton Wealth Management (Pty) Ltd (“GWM”), Graviton Financial Partners (Pty) Ltd (“GFP”), Satrix Investments (Pty) Ltd, Blue Ink Investments (Pty) Ltd (“Blue Ink”), Sanlam Capital Markets (Pty) Ltd (“SCM”), Sanlam Private Wealth (Pty) Ltd (“SPW”) and Sanlam Employee Benefits (Pty) Ltd (“SEB”), a division of Sanlam Life Insurance Limited; and has the following approved Management Companies under the Collective Investment Schemes Control Act: Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“SCI”) and Satrix Managers (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“Satrix”). Although all reasonable steps have been taken to ensure the information in this document is accurate, Sanlam Collective Investments (RF) (Pty) Ltd (“Sanlam Collective Investments”) does not accept any responsibility for any claim, damages, loss or expense; however it arises, out of or in connection with the information. No member of Sanlam gives any representation, warranty or undertaking, nor accepts any responsibility or liability as to the accuracy of any of this information. The information to follow does not constitute financial advice as contemplated in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act. Use or rely on this information at your own risk. Independent professional financial advice should always be sought before making an investment decision. Sanlam Group is a full member of the Association for Savings and Investment SA (ASISA). Collective investment schemes are generally medium- to long-term investments. Please note that past performances are not necessarily an accurate determination of future performances, and that the value of investments may go down as well as up. A schedule of fees and charges and maximum commissions is available from the Manager, Sanlam Collective Investments, and a registered and approved Manager in Collective Investment Schemes in Securities. The maximum fund charges for the SIM Enhanced Yield Fund include (including VAT): An initial advice fee of 0.34%; annual advice fee of 1.15% and annual manager fee of 0.48%. The most recent total expense ratio (TER) is 0.49%. The yield on the SIM Enhanced Yield Fund is a current yield (4.85% at 31 July 2020) and is calculated daily. Income funds derive their income from interest-bearing instruments, which are any assets, such as a corporate or government bond, stock or money market instrument that pays regular, periodic interest to the investor. Additional information of the proposed investment, including brochures, application forms and annual or quarterly reports, can be obtained from the Manager, free of charge. Collective investments are traded at ruling prices and can engage in borrowing and scrip lending. Collective investments are calculated on a net asset value basis, which is the total market value of all assets in the portfolio including any income accruals and less any deductible expenses such as audit fees, brokerage and service fees. Actual investment performance of the portfolio and the investor will differ depending on the initial fees applicable, the actual investment date, and the date of reinvestment of income as well as dividend withholding tax. Forward pricing is used. The Manager does not provide any guarantee either with respect to the capital or the return of a portfolio. The performance of the portfolio depends on the underlying assets and variable market factors. Performance is based on NAV to NAV calculations with income reinvestments done on the ex-div date. Lump sum investment performances are quoted. The portfolio may invest in other unit trust portfolios which levy their own fees, and may result is a higher fee structure for our portfolio. All the portfolio options presented are approved collective investment schemes in terms of Collective Investment Schemes Control Act, No 45 of 2002. The Manager has the right to close any portfolios to new investors to manage them more efficiently in accordance with their mandates. The portfolio management of all the portfolios is outsourced to financial services providers authorized in terms of the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act, 2002. Standard Bank of South Africa Ltd is the appointed trustee of the Sanlam Collective Investments Scheme.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Show Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Read previous post:
july market review gold
July 2020: recession devours jobs and dividends

July had some good news, but generally economic data and company announcements show more pain ahead.

Close